alt text

EXPECTED DA JANUARY 2014-AICPIN FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2013.

Click Here
alt text

LATEST

COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT FROM OTHER APPOINTMENT.

Click Here
alt text

MACP NEWS

MACP'S 10-20-30 is a very long year spanning one.Definitely this should be shortened.Initially 9 years should be taken in to account and after that the year gaps should be planned in a receding manner.

Read More
alt text

7th CPC NEWS

7th CENTRAL PAY COMMISSION EXPECTED PAY SCALE?.

Read More
alt text

DOPT NEWS

whether Children Education Allowance would be admissible beyond two children due to failure of sterilization operation.

Read More
alt text

CGHS HOSPITALS

Corporate hospitals across the country have threatened to stop cashless treatment to lakhs of Central Government employees from January 1.

Read More
alt text

NPS

At the time of exit, 60 per cent of the total amount is given as lump sum, while 40 per cent is used to purchase an annuity, which provides lifetime pension to an employee and his dependent parents/spouse at the time of retirement.

Read More
alt text

PENSIONERS NEWS

Pension and increments of a public servant cannot be withheld only on the basis a pending criminal case against him unless he is convicted, the apex administrative tribunal has held.

Read More

Regulation of pay on imposition of a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 – Dopt Orders

  • Thursday, February 6, 2014
  • by
  • ADMIN
  • No.6/3/2013-Estt (Pay-I) 
    Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions 
    Department of Personnel & Training
    North Block, New Delhi 
    Dated the 6th February, 2014
    OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Subject: Regulation of pay on imposition of a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

    The undersigned is directed to say that the following penalties prescribed in the Rule 11 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, have a bearing on the pay of the officer:
    11. Penalties
    Minor Penalties –
    (iii a) reduction to a lower stage in the time-scale of pay by one stage for a period not exceeding three years, without cumulative effect and not adversely affecting his pension.
    (iv) withholding of increments of pay;

    Major Penalties –

    (v) save as provided for in clause (iii) (a), reduction to a lower stage in the time- scale of pay for a specified period, with further directions as to whether or not the Government servant will earn increments of pay during the period of such reduction and whether on the expiry of such period, the reduction Will or will not have the effect of postponing the future increments of his pay

    (vi) reduction to lower time-scale of pay, grade, post or Service for a period to be specified in the order of penalty, which shall be a bar to the promotion of the Government servant during such specified period to the time-scale of pay, grade, post or Service from which he was reduced, with direction as to whether or not, on promotion on the expiry of the said specified period –
    (a) the period of reduction to time-scale of pay, grade, post or service shall operate to postpone future increments of his pay, and if so, to what extent; and
    (b) the Government servant shall regain his original seniority in the higher time scale of pay , grade, post or service;

    2. Consequent upon implementation of the recommendations of 6 th CPC under the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 pay scale of a post/grade for below HAG level means the Pay Band and Grade Pay specified for that post. Under the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 a Pay Band may cover Government servants in more than one Grade Pay or posts in the hierarchy. As per Rule 9 of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, the rate of increment in the revised pay structure is 3% of the sum of the pay in the Pay Band arid Grade Pay applicable, which is to be rounded off to the next multiple of 10. Further, as per Rule 10 of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, there is now a uniform date of increment, that is, l g July of the year.

    3. The mode of implementation of these penalties has been clarified to individual Ministries/Departments wherever references have been received. It is now proposed to issue detailed guidelines on the issue. The regulation of pay on imposition of these penalties is in the subsequent pants:

    A. Reduction to a lower stage of pay by one stage (Rule 11( iii ) all )

    On imposition of a penalty under this Rule, the pay would be fixed at the next lower stage in the Pay Band. In other words, in case of reduction by one stage, the revised pay would be the pay drawn in the Pay Band at the stage before the last increment. Grade Pay attached to the post would remain unchanged. The pay will be fixed by reversing the mode of allowing increments given in Rule 9 of the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008. The formula would be:-

    Reduced Pay In Pay Band = {(Pay in Pay Band+ Grade Pay) x 100/103} less (Grade Pay) (rounded off to next 10)

    Pay would be Pay in Pay Band as above + Grade Pay

    B. Withholding of increment {Rule 11(iv)}

    As the uniform date of increment now is 1st July, on imposition of a penalty of withholding of increment, the increment(s) due on the 1st of July falling after the date of imposition of the penalty would be withheld. In case where penalty of withholding of more than one increment is imposed, increments due on 1st of July in the subsequent years would similarly be withheld. The increment would be restored at the end of the period for which the penalty is imposed.

    This also applies to cases where the penalty is imposed for part of a year. For instance, if the penalty of withholding of the increment for six months is imposed on a Government servant in April 2013, then the increment falling due on 1.7.2013 will be withheld for a period of six months, that is, till 31.12.2013. The increment would be released w.e.f. 1.1.2014. In this case the next increment falling due on 1.7.2014 will also be allowed.

    C. Reduction to a lower stage in the time-scale of pay for a specified period Rule 11(v)} The process of imposition of penalty of reduction by one stage under Rule 11(iii a) explained above shall be repeated for every additional stage of reduction by taking the pay arrived at notionally as pay for the second reduction, and so on. Grade Pay shall remain unchanged.

    NOTE 1: It is not permissible to impose a penalty under this rule if the pay after imposition of the penalty would fall below the minimum of the Pay Band attached to the post.

    NOTE 2: A Pay Band may cover Government servants in different Grade Pays or holding posts at several levels in the hierarchy. It needs to be kept in mind that reduction to lower pay scale or grade is a distinct penalty, under Rule 11(vi).Therefore, while imposing a penalty of reduction to a lower stage in the time-scale of pay under Rule 11(v) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Authorities should weigh all factors before deciding upon the quantum of penalty, i.e., the number of stages by which the pay is to be reduced.

    D. Reduction to lower time-scale of pay under Rule 11(vi) As a result of imposition of a penalty of reduction to lower time-scale of pay, the pay of the Government servant would be reduced to the stage of pay he /she would have drawn had he/she continued in the lower post for the period of penalty. The mode of fixation of pay in this case is similar to reversing the mode of fixation of pay on promotion. Therefore, both pay in Pay Band and Grade Pay would be reduced.

    However, Disciplinary Authority has the power, in terms of FR 28, to indicate the pay which the Government servant on whom a penalty of reduction in rank has been imposed, would draw. The Government servant will be entitled to the Grade Pay of the post to which he has been reduced. Thus, the power of the Disciplinary Authority under FR 28 is limited to indicating the pay in the Pay Band applicable to the lower rank/post.

    In some cases imposition of a penalty under Rule 11(vi) may also involve a change in Pay Band. For instance a Government servant holding a post in PB-2 with Grade pay of Rs.4200/- may be reduced to a post in PB-1 with Grade Pay of Rs.2800/-

    It may also be noted that a Government servant cannot be reduced in rank to a post not held earlier by him in the cadre. For example, an LDC who qualifies as Assistant as a Direct Recruit and is later promoted as Section Officer cannot be reduced to the rank of LDC but only to that of an Assistant.

    4. Some illustrations on pay fixation in above types of cases are annexed.
    sd/- 
    (Mukesh Chaturvedi) 
    Deputy Secretary to the Government of India 
    Tele: 23093176
    Source: www.persmin.gov.in
    [http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02est/6_3_2013-Estt.Pay-I-06022014.pdf]

    Read More...

    50 per cent DA in the basic pay is set to merge soon

  • by
  • ADMIN
  • As per Dainik Bhasker Article Govt. is ready to merge 50% DA with Basic Pay:-

    38 million employees and 25 lakh pensioners electoral rarity

    50 per cent DA in the basic pay is set to merge soon
    Govt. exercises to attract 38 lakh workers, 25 lakh pensioners
    20 thousand crore additional burden on the exchequer
    Government eyes on approximately 2 and half crore votes of Central government employees and pensioners and their families. Govt is preparing to merge 50 per cent dearness allowance (DA) into the basic pay to attracted approximately 38 lakh employees and 25 lakh pensioners.

    That would be in the next fortnight. If it happen, extra burden would cost of Rs 20,000 crore to the exchequer.

    It may be pressure of employees of Trade Union/ threatening of indefinite strike by the central govt. employees with railway employee or it may be trial of attraction of 2.5 carores of voters. Infact D.A. is being merged with basic salary. The Secretary General of the AIRF Mr. Shiva Gopal Mishra who is representing nearly 12 lakh employees says last days, that he had corresponded with the Prime Minister’s Office and the Finance Ministry. He also met with Secretary of expenditure in this connection.

    This indicates that it will be announced just after the vote on account of parliament. Press Secretary of National Federation of Indian Railwaymen Mr. S.N. Malik said that the Cabinet note in this regard has become according to PMO sourcese. There is a file lying in the PMO at this time regarding this connection. It will be announced someday next week when Parliament is in session.

    Infact DA of Central Govt. Employees reached up to 90% at this time and again due started with DA increment from 1st Jan. If this time there is an increase of 11 per cent on DA; it will be 101 per cent . Malik says that when the Fifth CPC DA had reached 72 per cent, 50 per cent DA was merged with basic pay without any demand from staff side. This time it is not being done. This demand of merger of 50 per cent of DA into basic pay DA of the unions is old. In view of this, , Minister of State for Finance Namo Narain Meena said in Parliament stated in August last year that Sixth Pay Commission has not recommended to merge the DA with basic pay . So the government is not doing so. However , now the situation has changed, in the view of general election, to woo the all the public the decisions are being taken. In this series, if DA has to be merged with the basic pay, then the exchequer put a burden of Rs 20,000 crore is estimated .

    Source: Dainik Bhasker News
    Read More...

    Recovery of wrongful/excess payments made to Government servants: DoPT's Order

  • by
  • ADMIN
  • F. No. 18/26/ 2011-Estt (Pay-I) 
    Government of India 
    Ministry of Personnel, PG and Pension 
    Department of Personnel and Training 

    North Block, New Delhi, 
    Dated the 6th February, 2014 
    OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

    Subject: Recovery of wrongful/excess payments made to Government servants. 

    The undersigned is directed to say that the issue of recovery of  wrongful/excess payments made to Government servants has been examined in  consultation with the Department of Expenditure and the Department of Legal  Affairs in the light of the recent judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chandi  Prasad Uniyal And On vs State Of Uttarakhand And Ors, 2012 AIR SCW 4742,  (2012) 8 'SCC 417, decided on 17th August, 2012. The Hon'ble Court has observed  as under:  

    15. We are not convinced that this Court in various judgments referred to  hereinbefore has laid down any proposition of law that only if the State  or its officials establish that there was misrepresentation or fraud on the  part of the recipients of the excess pay, then only the amount paid could  be recovered. On the other hand, most of the cases referred to  hereinbefore turned on the peculiar facts and circumstances of those  cases either because the recipients had retired or on the verge of  retirement or were occupying lower posts in the administrative  hierarchy.

    16. We are concerned with the excess payment of public money which is  often described as "tax payers money" which belongs neither to the  officers who have effected over-payment nor that of the recipients. We  fail to see why the concept of fraud or misrepresentation is being  brought in such situations. Question to be asked is whether excess  money has been paid or not may be due to a bona fide mistake. Possibly,  effecting excess payment of public money by Government officers may  be due to various reasons like negligence, carelessness, collusion,  favouritism etc. because money in such situation does not belong to the  payer or the payee. Situations may also arise where both the payer and  the payee are at fault, then the mistake is mutual. Payments are being  effected in many situations without any authority of law and payments   have been received by the recipients also without any authority of law.  Any amount paid/received without authority of law can always be  recovered barring few exceptions of extreme hardships but not as a  matter of right, in such situations law implies an obligation on the payee  to repay the money, otherwise it would amount to unjust enrichment.

    2. Hon'ble Supreme Court also distinguished the cases like Shyam Babu Verma  v UOI, 1994 SCR (1) 700, 1994 SCC (2) 52, Syed Abdul Qadir and Ors. v. State of  Bihar and Ors,(2009) 3 SCC 475, Sahib Ram v. State of Haryana,1995 Supp (1)  SCC 18 etc., where it had not allowed recovery of excess payment in view of the  peculiar facts and circumstances of those cases so as to avoid extreme hardship to  the concerned employees, for example, where the employees concerned were mostly  junior employees, or they had retired or were on verge of retirement, the employees  were not at fault, and recovery which was ordered after a gap of many years would  have caused extreme hardship.

    3. In view of the law declared by Courts and recently reiterated by the Hon'ble  Supreme Court in the above cited case, Chandi Prasad Uniyal And Ors vs State Of  Uttarakhand And Ors, 2012 AIR SCW 4742, (2012) 8 SCC 417, the  Ministries/Departments are advised to deal with the issue of wrongful/excess  payments as follows:

    i. In all cases where the excess payments on account of wrong pay fixation,  grant of scale without due approvals, promotions without following the  procedure, or in excess of entitlements etc come to notice, immediate  corrective action must be taken.

    ii. In a case like this where the authorities decide to rectify an incorrect  order, a show-cause notice may be issued to the concerned employee  informing him of the decision to rectify the order which has resulted in  the overpayment, and intention to recover such excess payments. Reasons  for the decision should be clearly conveyed to enable the employee to  represent against the same. Speaking orders may thereafter be passed after consideration of the representations, if any, made by the employee.

    iii. Whenever any excess payment has been made on account of fraud,  misrepresentation, collusion, favouritism, negligence or, carelessness,  etc., roles of those responsible for overpayments in such cases, and the  employees who benefitted from such actions should be identified, and  departmental/criminal action should be considered in appropriate cases.

    iv. Recovery should be made in all cases of overpayment barring few  exceptions of extreme hardships. No waiver of recovery may be allowed  without the approval of Department of Expenditure.

    v. While ordering recovery, all the circumstances of the case should be  taken into account. In appropriate cases, the concerned employee may be  allowed to refund the money in suitable installments with the approval of  Secretary in the Ministry, in consultation with the FA.

    vi. Wherever the relevant rules provide for payment of interest on amounts  retained by the employee beyond the stipulated period etc as in the case  of TA, interest would continue to be recovered from the employee as  heretofore.

    sd/-
    (Mukesh Chaturvedi) 
    Deputy Secretary to the Government of India  

    Source: www.persmin.nic.in
    [http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02est/18_26_2011-Estt.Pay-I-06022014.pdf]

    Read More...

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has approved composition of the 7th Pay Commission,

  • Tuesday, February 4, 2014
  • by
  • ADMIN
  • NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has approved composition of the 7th Pay Commission, which will revise the salaries of over 50 lakh central government employees.

    "The Prime Minister has approved the composition of the 7th Central Pay Commission," the Finance Ministry said in a statement today.

    Former Supreme Court Justice Ashok Kumar Mathur has been appointed as chairman of the Commission, with Oil Secretary Vivek Rae as full time Member.

    Rathin Roy (Director, NIPFP) will be part-time Member and Meena Agarwal (OSD, Department of Expenditure) its Secretary.

    Earlier in September 2013, the Prime Minister had approved setting up of the 7th Pay Commission.

    The Commission has been mandated to submit its report in two years time and its recommendations would be implemented from January 1, 2016.

    The setting up of the Commission, whose recommendations will benefit about 50 lakh central government employees, including those in defence and railways, and about 30 lakh pensioners, comes ahead of the general elections.

    The government constitutes Pay Commission almost every ten years to revise the pay scales of its employees and often these are adopted by states after some modification.

    The sixth Pay Commission was implemented with effect from January 1,2006, the fifth from January 1, 1996 and fourth from January 1, 1986.

    Source:ET
    Read More...

    Dearness Allowance should be merged with the pay for all purposes – AIRF

  • Friday, January 31, 2014
  • by
  • ADMIN
  • All India Railwaymen’s Federation
    (Estd. 1924)

    4, State Entry Road,
    New Delhi-110055
    INDIA

    No.AIRF/13
    Dated: January 9, 2014

    The Secretary(Exp.),
    Ministry of Finance,
    (Government of India)
    North Block,
    New Delhi

    Dear Sir,

    Reg.: Merger of Dearness Allowance with Pay

    On the persistent forceful demand of the Central Government employees, including Railwaymen, successive Central Pay Commissions were appointed by the Government of India with a view to improve upon wage structure and to grant parity with other employees of the Public Sector Undertakings in the wake of market inflation and price hike of essential commodities. These Pay Commissions, while recommending revised pay structure have also recommended grant of Dearness Allowance on the basis of increase in the Price Index.

    The very purpose of compensating the pay with payment of Dearness Allowance is being defeated because of unbridled inflationary pressure on the economy and the consequent steep rise in the price of essential commodities.This has resulted in erosion of the value of the wage, remarkably beyond tolerable limit, as a consequence of which, payment of Dearness Allowance has failed to compensate devaluation of pay.

    While Dearness Allowance was merged with the pay on crossing the percentage beyond 50% during V CPC as the actual value of wage devaluated because of market hike to compensate eroded value of the wages besides payment of Dearness Allowance, but this time Dearness Allowance, which has already gone beyond 80% w.e.f. 1st July, 2013, is yet to be merged with the pay.

    It would, therefore, be quite appropriate and in the fitness of the thing that Dearness Allowance is merged with the pay for all purposes to compensate the erosion in the wage in the wake of market inflation and steep price hike of essential commodities which are posing serious constraints in the livelihood of the Govern employees in general and the low-paid employees in particular.

    Yours faithfully,
    sd/-
    (Shiva Gopal Mishra)
    General Secretary

    Source: AIRF
    Read More...

    Retired Govt Officials for consultants: Revised proforma for enrolment issued by CGA

  • Friday, January 24, 2014
  • by
  • ADMIN
  • No.G.25014/131/2013/MF.CGA/IAÐ/320-3S 9
    Government of India
    Ministry of Finance
    Department of Expenditure
    O/o Controller General of Accounts
    Internal Audit division
    Lok Nayak Bhavan Khan Market
    New Delhi 110003
    Dated: 6 Jan 2014
    OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Subject: Revised proforma for the enrolment of retired Government officials willing to be hired as consultants.

    This office has been maintaining a list of retired Govt. officials who are willing to work as consultants.

    It is requested that information about willing officials may be obtained in the revised proforma which is enclosed herewith along with terms and conditions for engagement as consultant. This will enable this office to provide relevant and necessary information to Ministries/Departments requiring services of consultants. In order to update our records the details of consultants engaged by you and feedback on the basis of their performance may also be furnished in the proforma enclosed.


    sd/-
    (Sonali Singh)
    Jt. Controller General of Accounts

    Source:http://cga.nic.in/writereaddata/RevisedProforma06012014.pdf
    Read More...

    Issue of Uniforms Liveries to MTS directly recruited through Staff Selection Commission post 6th CPC.

  • by
  • ADMIN
  • Controller General of Defence Accounts
    Ulan Batar Road, Palam, Delhi Canit-110010

    No. AN/XIV/14162/6th CPC/ Vol-V

    Dated : 23.01.2014

    To
    All PCsDA/CsDA
    All CFAs/PC of Fys) Kolkata

    CIRCULAR

    Subject: Issue of Uniforms/Liveries to MTS directly recruited through Staff Selection Commission post 6th CPC.

    The matter regarding issue of Uniforms and liveries to MTS recruited posts 6th CPC through Staff Selection Commission was referred to Ministry for clarification.

    2. DoP&T has since confirmed that Uniforms/Liveries and washing allowance to newly recruited MTS , post 6th CPC may be allowed as is being admitted to erstwhile Group ‘D’ posts of peon, daftary, jamadar, Junior Gestetner Operator, Farash, Chowkidar, Safaiwala, Mali etc. which have been designated as MTS in Group ‘C’ post 6th CPC.

    Further , it should be ensured that the Uniforms/Liveries are being admitted to those expected to wear respective uniforms while on duty.

    3. This is for your information, guidance and necessary action please.

    sd/-
    (Upendra Kumar)
    For CGDA

    Source: www.cgda.nic.in
    [http://www.cgda.nic.in/adm/uniforms_mts_230114.pdf]
    Read More...

    Popular Posts